Skip to main content
Scrutinizing and Supplementing Children’s Trade Books about Child Labor
Social Studies Research and Practice (2015)
  • John H. Bickford, III, Eastern Illinois University
  • Cynthia W. Rich, Eastern Illinois University

State and national initiatives place an increased emphasis on both students’ exposure to diverse texts and teachers’ integration of English/language arts and history/social studies. The intent is for students to critically examine diverse accounts and perspectives of the same historical event or era. Critical examination can be accomplished through teachers’ purposeful juxtaposition of age-appropriate, engaging trade books and relevant informational texts, such as primary source materials. To guide interested elementary and middle level teachers, researchers can evaluate trade books for historical representation and suggest divergent or competing narratives that compel students to scrutinize diverse perspectives. Researchers can locate germane primary sources and modify them in ways that maintain their historicity. As students read, they scrutinize, contextualize, and corroborate sources, which enables them to actively construct historical understandings. We examined children’s literature centered on child labor. We juxtaposed trade books targeting elementary students with those intended for middle level students. While our findings revealed various forms of historical misrepresentation, child labor trade books appear far more historically representative than those centered on slavery.

  • children's trade books,
  • historical misrepresentation,
  • historical thinking,
  • elementary social studies,
  • primary source material
Publication Date
Spring 2015
Citation Information
John H. Bickford and Cynthia W. Rich. "Scrutinizing and Supplementing Children’s Trade Books about Child Labor" Social Studies Research and Practice Vol. 10 Iss. 1 (2015)
Available at: