Skip to main content
Article
Dementia diagnoses from clinical and neuropsychological data compared: The Cache County Study
Neurology
  • JoAnn T. Tschanz, Utah State University
  • K. A. Welsh-Bohmer, Duke University
  • I. Skoog, Goteborg University
  • N. A. West, Utah State University
  • Maria C. Norton, Utah State University
  • Bonita W. Wyse, Utah State University
  • R. Nickles, Utah State University
  • J.C. S. Breitner, Johns Hopkins University
Document Type
Article
Publisher
American Academy of Neurology
Publication Date
1-1-2000
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To validate a neuropsychological algorithm for dementia diagnosis. METHODS: We developed a neuropsychological algorithm in a sample of 1,023 elderly residents of Cache County, UT. We compared algorithmic and clinical dementia diagnoses both based on DSM-III-R criteria. The algorithm diagnosed dementia when there was impairment in memory and at least one other cognitive domain. We also tested a variant of the algorithm that incorporated functional measures that were based on structured informant reports. RESULTS: Of 1,023 participants, 87% could be classified by the basic algorithm, 94% when functional measures were considered. There was good concordance between basic psychometric and clinical diagnoses (79% agreement, kappa = 0.57). This improved after incorporating functional measures (90% agreement, kappa = 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Neuropsychological algorithms may reasonably classify individuals on dementia status across a range of severity levels and ages and may provide a useful adjunct to clinical diagnoses in population studies.

Comments

Originally published by the American Academy of Neurology. Abstract available through remote link. Subscription required to access article fulltext.

Citation Information
Tschanz JT, Welsh-Bohmer KA, Skoog I, West N, Norton MC, Wyse BW, Nickles R*, Breitner JCS. Dementia diagnoses from clinical and neuropsychological data compared: The Cache County Study. Neurology 2000;54: 1290-1296.