Skip to main content
Article
Martha Stewart and the Forbidden Fruit: A New Story of Eve
College of Law Faculty Scholarship
  • Joan M Heminway, The University of Tennessee College of Law
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2009
Abstract
This paper narrates a biblical story - Eve’s ingestion of the forbidden fruit - and analogizes it to a recent business law story that I explore in my scholarship and use in my teaching - Martha Stewart’s sale of ImClone stock as alleged insider trading. The analogy, while imperfect, helps expose interesting questions about the descriptive and normative content of U.S. insider trading law and related legal process issues. Although many of the points made in the paper (and the related details and examples presented) can be and have been explored or used in other ways, I contend that the juxtaposition of Eve’s story with Martha’s has utility in illustrating desirable and undesirable attributes of U.S. insider trading regulation, in motivating related scholarship, and in teaching insider trading theory, doctrine, and enforcement under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5.
Citation Information
Heminway, Joan MacLeod, Martha Stewart and the Forbidden Fruit: A New Story of Eve (2009). Michigan State Law Review, Vol. 2009, p. 1017, Winter 2009; University of Tennessee Legal Studies Research Paper No. 126. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1692173