Skip to main content
Article
The (almost) redundant civil accessorial liability provisions of the Trade Practices Act
Law Faculty Publications
  • Joachim Dietrich, Bond University
Date of this Version
3-1-2008
Document Type
Journal Article
Publication Details

Interim status: Citation only.

Dietrich, J. (2008). The (almost) redundant civil accessorial liability provisions of the Trade Practices Act. Trade practices law journal, 16(1), 37-47.

Access the publisher's website.

2008 HERDC submission. FoR code: 1801

© Copyright Lawbook Co., 2008

Abstract
The Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) imposes civil accessorial liability on parties "involved in the contravention" of parts of the Act, defined in s 75B . Litigation and commentary on this section shows that it is difficult to prove accessorial liability and many claims have failed. This is because, problematically, the scheme of accessorial liability adopted means that an accessory must be shown to have actual knowledge of the misleading or deceptive nature of the principal's conduct. Yet, in most circumstances in which, historically, the accessory provisions have been relied upon, it is not necessary to establish accessorial liability at all. Instead, it is easier to pursue claims against natural persons for direct contravention of State Fair Trading Act provisions. This conclusion is supported by the recent High Court decision in Houghton v Arms .
Citation Information
Joachim Dietrich. "The (almost) redundant civil accessorial liability provisions of the Trade Practices Act" (2008)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/joachim_dietrich/1/