Skip to main content
Article
Resilience to global food supply catastrophes
Environment Systems and Decisions
  • Seth D. Baum, Global Catastrophic Risk Institute
  • David C. Denkenberger, Global Catastrophic Risk Institute
  • Joshua M. Pearce, Michigan Technological University
  • Alan Robock, Rutgers University - New Brunswick/Piscataway
  • Richelle Winkler, Michigan Technological University
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
5-9-2015
Disciplines
Abstract
Many global catastrophic risks threaten major disruption to global food supplies, including nuclear wars, volcanic eruptions, asteroid and comet impacts, and plant disease outbreaks. This paper discusses options for increasing the resilience of food supplies to these risks. In contrast to local catastrophes, global food supply catastrophes cannot be addressed via food aid from external locations. Three options for food supply resilience are identified: food stockpiles, agriculture, and foods produced from alternative (non-sunlight) energy sources including biomass and fossil fuels. Each of these three options has certain advantages and disadvantages. Stockpiles are versatile but expensive. Agriculture is efficient but less viable in certain catastrophe scenarios. Alternative foods are inexpensive pre-catastrophe but need to be scaled up post-catastrophe and may face issues of social acceptability. The optimal portfolio of food options will typically include some of each and will additionally vary by location as regions vary in population and access to food input resources. Furthermore, if the catastrophe shuts down transportation, then resilience requires local self-sufficiency in food. Food supply resilience requires not just the food itself, but also the accompanying systems of food production and distribution. Overall, increasing food supply resilience can play an important role in global catastrophic risk reduction. However, it is unwise to attempt maximizing food supply resilience, because doing so comes at the expense of other important objectives, including catastrophe prevention. Taking all these issues into account, the paper proposes a research agenda for analysis of specific food supply resilience decisions.
Publisher's Statement

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015. Publisher's version of record: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10669-015-9549-2

Citation Information
Seth D. Baum, David C. Denkenberger, Joshua M. Pearce, Alan Robock, et al.. "Resilience to global food supply catastrophes" Environment Systems and Decisions Vol. 35 Iss. 2 (2015) p. 301 - 313
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/jmpearce/144/