Skip to main content
Article
Improving the National Science and Technology Policy Development Process
IEMC 96 Proceedings (1996)
  • Jim Gover, Kettering University
  • E. G. Carayannis
  • M. Peterson
Abstract
The constituent-driven political process, where research and development performers provide the most vocal advocacy for federal R&D, is unable to create programs that can survive the scrutiny of critics and maintain bipartisan support during extreme budget pressure. The political process can be supplemented during program conception by introducing models that relate finding inputs to desired public outcomes. Game technologies developed by companies for strategic planning and the military for war simulation can be used to predict behaviors of those affected by science and technology policies.
Publication Date
1996
DOI
10.1109/IEMC.1996.547809
Publisher Statement
1996 IEEE
Citation Information
Jim Gover, E. G. Carayannis and M. Peterson. "Improving the National Science and Technology Policy Development Process" IEMC 96 Proceedings (1996) p. 168 - 174
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/jim-gover/12/