Skip to main content
Article
Interregional Recognition and Enforcement of Civil and Commercial Judgments: Lessons for China from US and EU Laws
Journal of Private International Law (2010)
  • Jie Huang, Duke University School of Law
Abstract

Judgment recognition and enforcement (JRE) between US sister states, between EU member states, and between Mainland China, Hong Kong, and Macao, are in the category of “interregional JRE.” This article focuses on what lessons China may draw from the US and the EU to develop its interregional JRE laws. It first discusses the status quo of the interregional JRE in China. Then it explores how the interregional economic integration demands the establishment of a multilateral interregional JRE arrangement in China. Finally it points out the four most crucial challenges in developing this arrangement: the challenge relating to the socialist characteristics of Mainland law, conflicts between civil and common laws, weak mutual trust, and the lack of a court of final review for cases from all three regions. It proposes solutions to each challenge by comparative studies with the US and the EU interregional JRE laws.

Keywords
  • Judgment recognition and enforcement,
  • civil procedure,
  • Mainland China,
  • Hong Kong,
  • Macao,
  • Brussels I Regulation,
  • Full Faith and Credit Clause
Disciplines
Publication Date
Spring April, 2010
Citation Information
Jie Huang. "Interregional Recognition and Enforcement of Civil and Commercial Judgments: Lessons for China from US and EU Laws" Journal of Private International Law Vol. 6 Iss. 1 (2010)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/jie_huang/4/