Skip to main content
Article
Participants’ Experiences of the Qualitative Interview: Considering the Importance of Research Paradigms
Qualitative Research
  • Jennifer R. Wolgemuth, University of South Florida
  • Zeynep Erdil-Moody, University of South Florida
  • Tara Opsal, Colorado State University
  • Jennifer E. Cross, Colorado State University
  • Tanya Kaanta, Park University
  • Ellyn M. Dickmann, University of Wisconsin
  • Soria Colomer, University of South Florida
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2015
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794114524222
Abstract

We used a multiple-case study to investigate participants’ experiences in interviews from six qualitative studies that differed in interview orientations, designs, methods, participants, and topics. Roulston’s (2010a, 2010b) interview orientation heuristic guided our ‘paradigm-driven’ analysis of participants’ experiences. We found no differences in participants’ articulation of benefits and risks by interview orientation. Participants’ experiences differed based on the opportunity to reflect on their interview experiences, the sensitivity of the topic explored, and the number of interviews conducted. We discuss the implications of our findings for ‘paradigm-driven’ qualitative research and suggest ethical questions qualitative interview researchers can ask to maximize the benefits of their interviews.

Citation / Publisher Attribution

Qualitative Research, v. 15, issue 3, p. 351-372

Citation Information
Jennifer R. Wolgemuth, Zeynep Erdil-Moody, Tara Opsal, Jennifer E. Cross, et al.. "Participants’ Experiences of the Qualitative Interview: Considering the Importance of Research Paradigms" Qualitative Research Vol. 15 Iss. 3 (2015) p. 351 - 372
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/jennifer-wolgemuth/18/