Skip to main content
Article
Driving the Paradigm: (Failing to Teach) Methodological Ambiguity, Fluidity, and Resistance in Qualitative Research
Qualitative Inquiry
  • Jennifer R. Wolgemuth, University of South Florida
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2016
Keywords
  • qualitative research,
  • methodologies,
  • reforming the social sciences,
  • pedagogy,
  • training,
  • evaluating and extending,
  • qualitative methods
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800415615621
Abstract

In this article, I explore my fantasy qualitative classroom, one that promotes “paradigm driving,” rather than paradigm-driven research. I discuss how paradigm essentialism, ontologization, and idolization, although important to learning qualitative research, get in the way of creative, flexible, and ambiguous approaches to research design. I share strategies for disrupting these forces in the classroom. My exploration highlights the challenges of teaching with multiple epistemologies in mind. I conclude by welcoming failure as necessary to revise my ideals and to stave off the fascism involved in imposing a utopian fantasy and looking forward to how I will work with failure the next time.

Citation / Publisher Attribution

Qualitative Inquiry, v. 22, issue 6, p. 518-525

Citation Information
Jennifer R. Wolgemuth. "Driving the Paradigm: (Failing to Teach) Methodological Ambiguity, Fluidity, and Resistance in Qualitative Research" Qualitative Inquiry Vol. 22 Iss. 6 (2016) p. 518 - 525
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/jennifer-wolgemuth/14/