Article
Are the stock markets “rigged”? An empirical analysis of regulatory change
International Review of Law and Economics
(2018)
Abstract
Volatile events in the stock market such as the 2010 Flash Crash have sparked concern that financial markets are “rigged” in favor of trading firms that use high frequency trading (“HFT”) systems. We analyze a regulatory change implemented by the SEC in 2007 by examining its effect on a key market metric, the bid-ask spread, an investor cost, and find that the regulatory shift, indeed, disadvantages investors. We link the implementation of this change to a shift in the volume of trades from a low-cost venue to a high-cost venue. We argue that this outcome is predicted by the incentives of the venues, non-profit stock exchanges owned by different types of members. The less-volatile, lower-cost New York Stock Exchange was owned by underwriters and included a specialist system that is less vulnerable to HFT tactics that can disadvantage investors.
Keywords
- Stock market,
- High frequency trading,
- Flash crashes,
- Non-profit,
- SEC
Publication Date
September, 2018
DOI
10.1016/j.irle.2018.03.002
Citation Information
Stephen F. Diamond and Jennifer Kuan. "Are the stock markets “rigged”? An empirical analysis of regulatory change" International Review of Law and Economics Vol. 55 (2018) p. 33 - 40 Available at: http://works.bepress.com/jennifer-kuan/7/