Skip to main content
Contribution to Book
Corporate Ventriloquism: Corporate Advocacy, the Coal Industry, and the Appropriation of Voice
Voice and Environmental Communication (2014)
  • Peter K. Bsumek, James Madison University
  • Jen Schneider, Colorado School of Mines
  • Steve Schwarze, University of Montana at Missoula
  • Jennifer Peeples, Utah State University
Abstract
In the second decade of the 21st century, the U.S. coal industry is facing unprecedented challenges. While for many years coal provided nearly half of the U.S. electricity, in the spring of 2012 that share dropped to below 40% and is expected to continue falling (Energy Information Administration, 2012).<sup>1</sup> Coal production is increasing not in Appalachia, the primary U.S. source for coal historically, but in Wyoming's Powder River Basin (Goodell, 2006). Market competition from the natural gas industry combined with well organized climate and anti-nountaintop removal (MTR) campagins have significantly curtailed the production of new coal-fired power plants in the United States (EIA, 2012). Under the Obama administration, the Environmental Protection Agency appears to be somewhat more amenable than the Bush administration to regulating carbon emissions as a pollutant, and more interested in enforcing Clean Water Act provisions applicable to MTR mining (Broder, 2012). Combined with sharp reductions in the number of coal mining jobs due to the increased efficiency of coal mining techniques, these circumstances have put the coal industry in Appalachia in a precarious position.
Publication Date
2014
Editor
Jennifer Peeples and Stephen Depoe
Publisher
Palgrave Macmillan
ISBN
9781349492725
DOI
10.1057/9781137433749
Citation Information
Peter K. Bsumek, Jen Schneider, Steve Schwarze and Jennifer Peeples. "Corporate Ventriloquism: Corporate Advocacy, the Coal Industry, and the Appropriation of Voice" LondonVoice and Environmental Communication (2014) p. 21 - 43
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/jen_schneider/31/