Skip to main content
Unpublished Paper
A matter of interpretation: bargaining over ambiguous contracts
Bond Business School Publications
  • Simon Grant, Rice University
  • Jeffrey J Kline, Bond University
  • John Quiggin, University of Queensland
Date of this Version
1-29-2009
Document Type
Working Paper
Publication Details

Preprint

S. Grant, J. Kline, J. Quiggin (2009) A matter of interpretation: bargaining over ambiguous contracts

Paper presented at the 5th Pan-Pacific Conference on Game Theory, Day 2 (Thursday, 20 November 2008).

Copyright © S. Grant, J. Kline, J. Quiggin, 2009.

Abstract
We present a formal treatment of contracting in the face of ambiguity. The central idea is that boundedly rational individuals will not always interpret the same situation in the same way. More specifically, even with well defined contracts, the precise actions to be taken by each party to the contract might be disputable. Taking this potential for dispute into account, we analyze the efects of ambiguity on contracting. We find that risk averse agents will engage in ambiguous contracts for risk sharing reasons. In addition to the risk sharing motivations for contracting in the presence of ambiguity, we find that agents may contract in order to reduce the downside efects of non-cooperative opportunism arising from ambiguity.
Citation Information
Simon Grant, Jeffrey J Kline and John Quiggin. "A matter of interpretation: bargaining over ambiguous contracts" (2009)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/jeffrey_kline/13/