Skip to main content
Article
"Anyplace but the state hospital": examining assumptions about the benefits of admission diversion
Systems and Psychosocial Advances Research Center Publications and Presentations
  • Jeffrey L. Geller, University of Massachusetts Medical School
UMMS Affiliation
Department of Psychiatry
Date
2-1-1991
Document Type
Article
Medical Subject Headings
Community Mental Health Centers; Continuity of Patient Care; Crisis Intervention; *Deinstitutionalization; Emergency Services, Psychiatric; Hospitals, State; Humans; Mental Disorders; *Patient Transfer; United States
Abstract
One function of contemporary psychiatric emergency services is to divert patient admissions from state hospitals. Underlying this mandate are a series of untested assumptions about the positive effects of admission diversion. The author examines these assumptions using data on inpatient admissions from a crisis intervention service. Although the service was successful in preventing first admissions to the state hospital, the rate of recidivist admissions increased. Inpatient treatment in general or private hospitals did not result in shorter lengths of stay or fewer bed days than state hospital treatment. Because patients could be sent to any of several hospitals, some located far from the catchment area, continuity of care and treatment in the local community were not advanced by diverting admissions from the state hospital.
Rights and Permissions
Citation: Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1991 Feb;42(2):145-52.
Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMed
PubMed ID
1997363
Citation Information
Jeffrey L. Geller. ""Anyplace but the state hospital": examining assumptions about the benefits of admission diversion" Vol. 42 Iss. 2 (1991) ISSN: 0022-1597 (Linking)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/jeffrey_geller/21/