"Nitinol Stent Implantation vs. Balloon Angioplasty for Lesions in the Superficial Femoral and Proximal Popliteal Arteries of Patients With Claudication: Three-Year Follow-up From the RESILIENT Randomized Trial:" by John R. Laird

Article

Nitinol Stent Implantation vs. Balloon Angioplasty for Lesions in the Superficial Femoral and Proximal Popliteal Arteries of Patients With Claudication: Three-Year Follow-up From the RESILIENT Randomized Trial:

Journal of Endovascular Therapy (2012)

John R. Laird, University of California, Davis
Barry T. Katzen, Baptist Hospital of Miami
Dierk Scheinert, Leipzig University
Johannes Lammer, Medical University of Vienna
Jeffrey Carpenter, University of Pennsylvania
Maurice Buchbinder, Scripps Health
Rajesh Dave, PinnacleHealth System
Gary Ansel, Riverside Methodist Hospital
Alexandra Lansky, Yale University
Ecaterina Cristea, Columbia University Medical Center
Tyrone J. Collins, Ochsner Medical Center
Jeffrey Goldstein
Annie Y. Cao, Edwards Lifesciences Corporation
Michael R. Jaff, Harvard University

Link

Disciplines

Publication Date

January 2, 2012

DOI

10.1583/11-3627.1

Citation Information

John R. Laird, Barry T. Katzen, Dierk Scheinert, Johannes Lammer, et al.. "Nitinol Stent Implantation vs. Balloon Angioplasty for Lesions in the Superficial Femoral and Proximal Popliteal Arteries of Patients With Claudication: Three-Year Follow-up From the RESILIENT Randomized Trial:" Journal of Endovascular Therapy Vol. 19 Iss. 1 (2012) p. 1 - 9
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/jeffrey-p-carpenter/43/