Skip to main content
Article
In-Group or Out-Group Extemity: Importance of the Threatened Social Identity
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (1993)
  • Jeffrey Noel, University of Missouri-St. Louis
  • Nyla R. Branscombe
  • Daniel L Wann, Murray State University
  • Jason Coleman
Abstract
Some researchers have found that out-group members are responded to more extremely than in-group members; others have found the reveres. The pre authors hypothesized that when importance of group membership was low, out-group extremity would be observed. That is, when the target's actions have few or no implications for the perceive's identity, out-group extremity will occur. In-group extremity was expected when perceivers are high in identification with the in-group. The presence of a threat to one's identity was predicted to intensity the in-group extremity effect for highly identified persons only Evaluations of a loyal or disloyal in-group or out-group member were made by highly identified or weakly identified in-group participants under threatening or nonthreatening conditions. The results confirmed the predicted pattern of effects. Implications for sports spectators and other self-selected group members are discussed.
Disciplines
Publication Date
August, 1993
DOI
10.1177/0146167293194003}
Citation Information
Jeffrey Noel, Nyla R. Branscombe, Daniel L Wann and Jason Coleman. "In-Group or Out-Group Extemity: Importance of the Threatened Social Identity" Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin Vol. 19 Iss. 4 (1993) p. 381 - 388
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/jeffrey-noel/18/