Skip to main content
Article
iSAW: Integrating Structure, Actors, and Water to Study Socio-Hydro-Ecological Systems
Earth's Future
  • Rebecca L. Hale
  • Andrea Armstrong, Utah State University
  • Michelle A. Baker, Utah State University
  • Sean Bedingfield, Utah State University
  • David Betts, Utah State University
  • Caleb Buahin, Utah State University
  • Martin Buchert
  • Todd Crowl
  • R. Ryan Dupont, Utah State University
  • James R. Ehleringer
  • Joanna Endter-Wada, Utah State University
  • Courtney Flint, Utah State University
  • Jacqualine Grant
  • Sarah Hinners
  • Jeffery S. Horsburgh, Utah State University
  • Douglas Jackson-Smith, Utah State University
  • Amber S. Jones, Utah State University
  • Carlos Licon, Utah State University
  • Sarah E. Null, Utah State University
  • Augustina Odame, Utah State University
  • Diane E. Pataki
  • David Rosenberg, Utah State University
  • Madlyn Runburg
  • Philip Stoker
  • Courtenay Strong
Document Type
Article
Publisher
AGU Publications
Publication Date
3-26-2015
Disciplines
Abstract
Urbanization, climate, and ecosystem change represent major challenges for managing water resources. Although water systems are complex, a need exists for a generalized representation of these systems to identify important components and linkages to guide scientific inquiry and aid water management. We developed an integrated Structure-Actor-Water framework (iSAW) to facilitate the understanding of and transitions to sustainable water systems. Our goal was to produce an interdisciplinary framework for water resources research that could address management challenges across scales (e.g., plot to region) and domains (e.g., water supply and quality, transitioning, and urban landscapes). The framework was designed to be generalizable across all human–environment systems, yet with sufficient detail and flexibility to be customized to specific cases. iSAW includes three major components: structure (natural, built, and social), actors (individual and organizational), and water (quality and quantity). Key linkages among these components include: (1) ecological/hydrologic processes, (2) ecosystem/geomorphic feedbacks, (3) planning, design, and policy, (4) perceptions, information, and experience, (5) resource access and risk, and (6) operational water use and management. We illustrate the flexibility and utility of the iSAW framework by applying it to two research and management problems: understanding urban water supply and demand in a changing climate and expanding use of green storm water infrastructure in a semi-arid environment. The applications demonstrate that a generalized conceptual model can identify important components and linkages in complex and diverse water systems and facilitate communication about those systems among researchers from diverse disciplines.
DOI
10.1002/2014EF000295
Citation Information
Rebecca L. Hale, Andrea Armstrong, Michelle A. Baker, Sean Bedingfield, et al.. "iSAW: Integrating Structure, Actors, and Water to Study Socio-Hydro-Ecological Systems" Earth's Future Vol. 3 Iss. 3 (2015) p. 110 - 132
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/jeffery-horsburgh/6/