Conceptions of Speech Acts in the Theory and Practice of Argumentation: A Case Study of a Debate About AdvocatingStudies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
Publication VersionPublished Version
AbstractFar from being of interest only to argumentation theorists, conceptions of speech acts play an important role in practitioners’ self-reflection on their own activities. After a brief review of work by Houtlosser, Jackson and Kauffeld on the ways that speech acts provide normative frameworks for argumentative interactions, this essay examines an ongoing debate among scientists in natural resource fields as to the appropriateness of the speech act of advocating in policy settings. Scientists’ reflections on advocacy align well with current scholarship, and the scholarship in turn can provide a deeper understanding of how to manage the communication challenges scientists face.
RightsThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)
Copyright OwnerStudies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
Citation InformationJean Goodwin. "Conceptions of Speech Acts in the Theory and Practice of Argumentation: A Case Study of a Debate About Advocating" Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric Vol. 36 Iss. 1 (2014) p. 79 - 98
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/jeangoodwin/9/