Skip to main content
Article
Clinical efficacy of SoftSeal-STF hemostatic pad with short hold time compared to traditional manual compression after transfemoral catheterization
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Nolan Machernis, Advocate Aurora Health
  • Tadele W. Mengesha, Advocate Aurora Health
  • Robyn Shearer, Advocate Aurora Health
  • Louie Kostopoulos, Advocate Aurora Health
  • Yoseph Shalev, Advocate Aurora Health
  • Tonga Nfor, Advocate Aurora Health
  • Jayant Khitha, Advocate Aurora Health
  • M. Fuad Jan
  • Tanvir Bajwa, Advocate Aurora Health
  • Suhail Allaqaband, Advocate Aurora Health
Affiliations

Aurora Cardiovascular Services

Aurora Sinai/Aurora St. Luke’s Medical Centers

Publication Date
3-21-2017
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Access site complications after angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) affect mortality, morbidity, length of stay and overall cost. The SoftSeal-STF Hemostatic Pad (SS) is a novel product to achieve hemostasis. We hypothesized SS with a short hold time was equivalent to traditional manual compression (TMC) after femoral catheterization.

METHODS: Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing femoral cardiac catheterization with and without PCI was conducted. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those with SS and short hold time and those with TMC. Groups underwent 1:1 propensity matching for bleeding risk score and type of anticoagulant used.

RESULTS: Between April 2015 and June 2016, a total of 1,348 patients were included in the propensity match analysis. After matching, SS group included 218 patients and TMC 1,130. SS group [65.6% male (n=143), mean age 67 years, 85.3% PCI] had an average hold time of 7.79 minutes while TMC group [58.8% male (n=664), mean age 67.3 years, 60.2% PCI] had an average hold time of 20 minutes. Mean SS hold time 7.79 minutes (SD+/- 3.38) with 95% CI (7.79, 8.25) is statistically significant (P< 0.001) compared to TMC. Primary endpoint of hemostasis without complication occurred in 97.2% of SS group and 96.9% of TMC group, proportion difference with 95% CI is 0.35% (-2.14%, 2.83), significant for equivalence (p

CONCLUSIONS: Clinical efficacy of the SS with significantly shorter hold times is equivalent to TMC.

Document Type
Abstract
Citation Information

Machernis N, Mengesha T, Shearer R, et al. Clinical Efficacy Of Softseal-Stf Hemostatic Pad With Short Hold Time Compared To Traditional Manual Compression After Transfemoral Catheterization. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2017;69(11):1165. doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(17)34554-0.