Socio-Economic Impacts and Public Value of Government-Funded Research: Lessons From Four US National Science Foundation InitiativesResearch Policy (2017)
Interest in evaluating non-economic social outcomes of science and technology research has risen in policy circles in recent years. The interest in social impacts of research has not yet given rise to a great proliferation of useful, valid techniques for evaluating such impacts. This study presents detailed case studies of four US National Science Foundation (NSF) programs/initiatives to provide a framework for understanding diverse efforts at addressing social impacts, and to suggest some important gaps in our research approaches for assessing socio-economic impacts of research. The four cases studied – the Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCoR), the Innovation Corps (I-Corps), the Arizona State University Center for Nanotechnology in Society, and the NSF “Broader Impacts” criteria—were chosen for their diversity in intent and modality but operating within a single agency. The cases are compared based on criteria important for assessing socio-economic outcomes: the initiative’s modality, enabling policy vehicle, benefit guarantor, distribution and appropriability of benefits, specificity of beneficiary, social-economic range, and timing of the benefit stream. The paper concludes with a discussion of the most pressing methodological and theoretical issues that need addressing for greater progress in assessing social impacts.
- broader impacts,
- National Science Foundation
Citation InformationJan Youtie and Barry Bozeman. "Socio-Economic Impacts and Public Value of Government-Funded Research: Lessons From Four US National Science Foundation Initiatives" Research Policy (2017)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/jan_youtie/104/