Skip to main content
Article
The Polarization of Reproductive and Parental Decision-Making
Florida State University Law Review
  • Jamie R. Abrams, University of Louisville Louis D. Brandeis School of Law
Publication Date
7-1-2017
Document Type
Article
Abstract

Women’s abortion and parental decision-making in child rearing are constructed as polarized methods of decision-making in law, politics, and society. Women’s abortion decision-making is understood as myopic and individualistic. Parental decision-making is understood as sacrificial and selfless. This polarization leaves reproductive decision-making isolated, marginalized, and vulnerable while parental decision-making is essentialized, protected, and revered. Both framings are inaccurate and problematic. A unified family decision-making framework that aligns abortion decision-making and parental decision-making reveals that both forms of decision-making are more multi-dimensional, relational, and family-centered than currently understood. This Article exposes the ground to be gained by crossing longstanding boundaries in family law and reproductive rights to more accurately and inclusively frame decision-making. This is a critical step to pull abortion decision-making from its marginalized periphery and reposition it as complex, imperfect, family-focused, and central to family law

Citation Information
Jamie R. Abrams. "The Polarization of Reproductive and Parental Decision-Making" (2017) p. 1281 - 1330
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/jamie-abrams/7/