Article
Disproof Riemann, Goldbach, Poincare, P=NP, Bernoulli, All Math Theorems
Travaux Mathematiques, Illinois Journal Math, Notices in mathematics, Mathematics Magazine (2014)
Abstract

Poincare disproved-I do not want to be bent into a 3 sphere even though I am a simply connected closed manifold nor do I need to bent into a 3 sphere. I do not homeomorphically map if I am constantly changing as a manifold. A constantly changing manifold cannot one to one map into a 3 sphere. Bernoulli Disproved. Increase the pressure on a fluid and the fluid can move faster, fast movement does not have to cause a decrease in fluid pressure thereby disproving Bernoulli. Goldbach disproved. From wikipedia.org accessed on 12/1/2013, "Goldbach's conjecture is one of the oldest and best-known unsolved problems in number theory and in all of mathematics. It states: Every even integer greater than 2 can be expressed as the sum of two primes.[1] The conjecture has been shown to hold up through 4 × 1018[2] and is generally assumed to be true, but remains unproven despite considerable effort." Disproof. Take the number 6 an even integer greater than 2. Look at the sums that can equal 6. 3+3, 2+2+2,4+2, 5+1 so the Goldbach conjecture is disproved to some degree as other sums besides 2 primes can be used. An integer greater than 2 can be expressed as the sum of more than 2 primes. Take the number 4, 2+2, 3+1, 4+0 shows 4 primes and 2 non primes can equal 4 showing cases in which the conjecture does not work. If I am asked to prove that "A person can walk across the street," if I can run, swim, fly, dig across the street I have disproved the Conjecture as I can do more than walk across the street. Take the example of infinite even integer. One cannot express that infinite even integer as the sum of 2 primes as infinite numbers are not considered to be prime so infinite number +infinite number would equal an infinite even integer but not be 2 prime numbers infinity. Infinity is not prime as more than 1 and infinity can multiply into infinity. Riemann Disproof. Consider number zeta off the Riemann line defined to be off the Riemann line. Although a zero of the equation, zeta is defined as not on the line therefore disproving the Riemann hypothesis. Similar disproof applies to 0, oscillating numbers, changing numbers, and negative numbers as well. A negative number is not along the Riemann line. P=NP disproof. A machine produces solution P and a manual process produces solution NP. If we always have the manual solution be different than the machine solution P does not equal NP. Disproof of all mathematical proofs. All mathematical theorems can be disproven by considering that one has the right to consider an idea disproved. Consider pi =3.14 for example. I disprove that p=3.14 by saying I have the right to say that pi does not have that value and so on. All mathematical theories can be disproved by expression of the right to consider the theory, conjecture disproven as one has the right to consider an idea irrelevant, disproven, unrelated to changing, oscillating, altering, transforming, infinite, transcending cases. James T. Struck BA, BS, AA, mLIS P O Box 61 Evanston IL 60204

Keywords
• Math,
• Disproof,
• Poincare,
• P=NP,
• Goldbach,
• Riemann,
• Bernouilli,
• All Math Theorems
Disciplines
Publication Date
2014
Citation Information
James T Struck. "Disproof Riemann, Goldbach, Poincare, P=NP, Bernoulli, All Math Theorems" Travaux Mathematiques, Illinois Journal Math, Notices in mathematics, Mathematics Magazine (2014)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/james_struck/46/