About James S. Rogers
James Steven Rogers, Professor of Law, teaches and writes in the areas of contracts, modern commercial law, particularly payment systems, the law of restitution, and the history of Anglo-American commercial law.
Professor Rogers has played a major role in the development of modern commercial law. He served as Reporter (principal drafter) for the Drafting Committee to Revise UCC Article 8, which established a new legal framework for the modern system of electronic, book-entry securities holdings through central depositories and other intermediaries. One observer characterized that project as “the most challenging and ambitious uniform or model law project since the creation of the UCC” and remarked on the “outstanding work of the tireless and imaginative reporter, Professor James Steven Rogers.” Prof. Rogers has spoken on that project at numerous symposia and conferences both in the United States and abroad. He was also involved in the projects on negotiable instruments (UCC Articles 3 and 4) and secured transactions (UCC Article 9).
He is widely published in law reviews on subjects of modern commercial law and bankruptcy, particularly in the fields of investment securities, negotiable instruments, and the history of Anglo-American commercial law. His 1995 book The Early History of the Law of Bills and Notes was published by Cambridge University Press. One reviewer of that book called it “brilliant, daring, even iconoclastic in its scope,” noting that “Rogers' book can only be called path-breaking.” Another remarked that while “few technical subjects remain so nearly inaccessible to those engaged in interdisciplinary studies as the evolution of exchange mechanisms,” Rogers “writes with great technical proficiency and precision” so that “this is a book that most general historians will find accessible.” Yet another reviewer observed that “this is a thoroughly absorbing and consistently illuminating book.”
Professor Rogers recently completed a book, The End of Negotiable Instruments: Bringing Payment Systems Law Out of the Past, published by Oxford University Press , on the modern law of payment systems and the role of history in the development of that law. Unlike most discussions of reform of payment systems law—which assume that the existing law works well for traditional paper-based systems—Rogers’ book argues that the law of checks and notes, as set out in Articles 3 and 4 of the Uniform Commercial Code, is itself anachronistic and all but incoherent. The book shows much of the current law of checks and notes is the product of nothing more than that historical fluke, such as odd details of the eighteenth century Stamps Acts. It shows that there is no need for a statute governing promissory notes and that the law of checks would be far simpler if it treated checks simply as instructions to the financial system, akin to debit or credit cards.
Rogers’ work is well-known abroad as well as in the United States. He has participated in symposia on comparative aspects of the history of commercial law in Italy and Spain. He has spoken on the commercial law foundation of the securities clearance and settlement system at programs in England, Australia, China, Japan, Mexico, and the Netherlands. He served as one of the United States delegates to the Hague Conference on Private International Law project to negotiate and draft a Convention on Choice of Law for Securities Holding Through Securities Intermediaries and as a member of Drafting Group for that Convention.
Prior to joining the Boston College Law School faculty, Rogers practiced with the firm of Sullivan & Worcester in Boston, Massachusetts and clerked for Judge Bailey Aldrich of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. He received a J.D. magna cum laude from Harvard Law School in 1976, where he served on the Harvard Law Review and was awarded the Fay Diploma for graduating first in his class in cumulative G.P.A. He received his A.B. summa cum laude from the University of Pennsylvania, 1973, where he studied philosophy and history.
- Fall 2016: The Law of Money, Contracts
- Spring 2017: No courses taught
James S. Rogers
Professor of Law
Boston College Law School
885 Centre Street
Newton Center, MA 02459
Commercial Law: Payment Systems (11)
The End of Negotiable Instruments: Bringing Payments Systems Law Out of the Past (2011)
In The End of Negotiable Instruments: Bringing Payments Systems Law Out of the Past, author James Rogers challenges the basic assumptions of the law of checks and notes and its history, and provides a well-reasoned ...
The New Old Law of Electronic Money SMU Law Review (2005)
A variety of electronic money systems have recently been proposed or implemented in which the initial transaction between the parties would—without any contact to the banking system—result in the instantaneous transfer of bank credit. For ...
The Basic Principle of Loss Allocation for Unauthorized Checks Wake Forest Law Review (2004)
It is commonly thought that the Uniform Commercial Code adopts a negligence principle as the basis of loss allocation for the check system. This Article argues that this common assumption is wrong. Instead, the fundamental ...
Commercial Law of Securities Holding (12)
The Revision of Canadian Law on Securities Holdings Through Intermediaries: Who, What, When, Where, How and Why? Canadian Business Law Journal (2007)
I'm delighted to have the opportunity to comment on the legislation that has recently been adopted in Ontario and Alberta to revise Canadian law in a fashion consistent with the changes that were made in ...
Toward International Harmonization of the Commercial Law of the Modern Securities Holding and Transfer System: Some Reflection from the United States Article 8 Revision Project Modernizing Securities Ownership, Transfer and Pledging Laws: A Discussion Paper on the Need for International Harmonization (1996)
Published by the Capital Markets Forum: Section on Business Law, International Bar Association
An Essay on Horseless Carriages and Paperless Negotiable Instruments: Some Lessons from the Article 8 Revision Idaho Law Review (1995)
As practices change, so too must the language and concepts that define and describe them. That is the lesson to be drawn from the past few decades’ work on the commercial law of investment securities. ...