Skip to main content
Robinson Township v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania: Examination and Implications
Rutgers Law Review (2015)
  • John C. Dernbach
  • James R. May, Widener University - Harrisburg Campus
  • Kenneth T. Kristl, Widener University - Delaware Campus
In Robinson Township v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held unconstitutional major parts of Pennsylvania’s “Act 13”—a 2012 oil and gas law designed to facilitate the development of natural gas from Marcellus Shale. In so doing, the Court breathed new life into Article I, Section 27 of Pennsylvania’s constitution, which creates public rights in certain environmental amenities and requires the state to “conserve and maintain” public resources “for the benefit of all the people.” This paper describes the decision, explains some of its immediate implications in Pennsylvania, and also explains its importance for public environmental rights and environmental constitutionalism elsewhere.
  • environmental law,
  • constitutional law,
  • Pennsylvania
Publication Date
Citation Information
John C. Dernbach, James R. May and Kenneth T. Kristl. "Robinson Township v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania: Examination and Implications" Rutgers Law Review Vol. 67 (2015)
Available at: