Skip to main content
Article
Regulating Away Competition: The Effect of Regulation on Entrepreneurship and Employment
Journal of Regulatory Economics (2017)
  • James Bailey, Providence College
  • Diana Thomas
Abstract
Many scholars have worried that regulation deters entrepreneurship because it increases the cost of entry, reduces innovation in the regulated industry, and benefits large firms because they can overcome the costs of complying with regulations more easily than smaller firms. Using novel data on the extent of US federal regulations by industry and data on firm births and employment from the Statistics of US Businesses, we run fixed effects regressions to show that more-regulated industries experienced fewer new firm births and slower employment growth in the period 1998–2011. Large firms may even successfully lobby government officials to increase regulations to raise their smaller rivals’ costs. We also find that regulations inhibit employment growth in all firms and that large firms are less likely to exit a heavily regulated industry than small firms.
Keywords
  • economics,
  • industrial organziation,
  • public finance,
  • microeconomics,
  • sc4,
  • regulation,
  • entreprenership,
  • k23,
  • l26,
  • l51,
  • J21
Publication Date
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-017-9343-9
Citation Information
James Bailey and Diana Thomas. "Regulating Away Competition: The Effect of Regulation on Entrepreneurship and Employment" Journal of Regulatory Economics Vol. 52 Iss. 3 (2017) p. 237 - 254 ISSN: 0922-680X
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/james-b-bailey/11/