Article
Discussion of ”Dissecting multiple imputation from a multi-phase inference perspective: what happens when god’s, imputer’s and analyst’s models are uncongenial?”
Statistica Sinica
Document Type
Article
Disciplines
Publication Version
Published Version
Publication Date
10-1-2017
DOI
10.5705/ss.2014.067
Abstract
We would like to first congratulate Drs. Xie and Meng on their excellent work on investigating the mystery of multiple imputation. Multiple imputation (MI) has been promoted as a general purpose estimation tool for missing data, but there are debates over its statistical validity in many practical situations. This article will certainly serve an important building block to address these debates from a multiphase inference perspective.
Copyright Owner
Institute of Statistical Science, Academia Sinica
Copyright Date
2017
Language
en
File Format
application/pdf
Citation Information
Shu Yang and Jae Kwang Kim. "Discussion of ”Dissecting multiple imputation from a multi-phase inference perspective: what happens when god’s, imputer’s and analyst’s models are uncongenial?”" Statistica Sinica Vol. 27 Iss. 4 (2017) p. 1568 - 1573 Available at: http://works.bepress.com/jae-kwang-kim/39/
This article is part of a discussion from S. Yang and J.K. Kim (2017). Discussion of ”Dissecting multiple imputation from a multi-phase inference perspective: what happens when god’s, imputer’s and analyst’s models are uncongenial?” by Xie and Meng, Statistica Sinica, 27, 1485-1594. doi: 10.5705/ss.2014.067. Posted with permission.