Skip to main content
Article
SJT, MCQ, ETC… The worrying conflation of format and content
Medical Education (2018)
  • Jacob Pearce, Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER)
  • Brad Jackel, Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER)
Abstract
At a recent conference on student selection in the health professions, it became obvious that researchers and practitioners continue to routinely conflate the format and content of assessments. What do multiple‐choice questions (MCQs), single best answers questions (SBAQs), extended matching questions (EMQs), very short answer questions (VSAQs), objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) and multiple mini‐interviews (MMIs) all have in common? They all refer to format rather than content: an MCQ that assesses basic knowledge recall is qualitatively different from an MCQ that assesses reasoning.
Keywords
  • Academic achievement,
  • Medical education,
  • Psychological tests,
  • Emotional intelligence,
  • School entrance requirements
Publication Date
September, 2018
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/medu.13644
Citation Information
Jacob Pearce and Brad Jackel. "SJT, MCQ, ETC… The worrying conflation of format and content" Medical Education Vol. 52 Iss. 9 (2018) p. 993 - 993 ISSN: 0308-0110
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/jacob_pearce/61/