Skip to main content
Article
Mitigation of Odor, NH3, H2S, GHG, and VOC Emissions With Current Products for Use in Deep-Pit Swine Manure Storage Structures
Frontiers in Environmental Science
  • Baitong Chen, Iowa State University
  • Jacek A. Koziel, Iowa State University
  • Chumki Banik, Iowa State University
  • Hantian Ma, Iowa State University
  • Myeongseong Lee, Iowa State University and Chungnam National University
  • Jisoo Wi, Iowa State University and Chungnam National University
  • Zhanibek Meiirkhanuly, Iowa State University
  • Samuel C. O'Brien, Iowa State University
  • Peiyang Li, Iowa State University
  • Daniel S. Andersen, Iowa State University
  • Andrzej Białowiec, Iowa State University and Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences
  • David B. Parker, United States Department of Agriculture
Document Type
Article
Publication Version
Published Version
Publication Date
12-23-2020
DOI
10.3389/fenvs.2020.613646
Abstract

Odorous gas emissions from swine production have been a concern for neighbors and communities near livestock farms. Manure storage is one of the main sources of gaseous emissions. Manure additive products are marketed as a simple solution to this environmental challenge. Manure additives are user-friendly for producers and can be applied (e.g., periodically poured into manure) without changing the current manure storage structure. Little scientific data exist on how these products perform in mitigating gaseous emissions from swine manure. The research objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of 12 marketed manure additives on mitigating odor, ammonia (NH3), hydrogen sulfide (H2S), greenhouse gases (GHG), and odorous volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from stored swine manure. A controlled pilot-scale setup was used to conduct 8-week long trials using manufacturer-prescribed dosages of additives into swine manures. Manure was outsourced from three swine farms to represent a variety of manure storage types and other factors affecting the properties. Measured gaseous emissions were compared between the treated and untreated manure. None of the tested products showed a significant reduction in gaseous emissions when all (n = 3) manures were treated as replicates. Selected products showed a wide range of statistically-significant reduction and generation of gaseous emissions when emissions were compared in pairs of manure types from one farm. The latter observation highlighted the lack of consistent mitigation of gaseous emissions by manure additives. The results of this study do not warrant full-scale trials with the tested products.

Comments

This article is published as Chen, Baitong, Jacek A. Koziel, Chumki Banik, Hantian Ma, Myeongseong Lee, Jisoo Wi, Zhanibek Meiirkhanuly et al. "Mitigation of odor, NH3, H2S, GHG, and VOC emissions with current products for use in deep-pit swine manure storage structures." Frontiers in Environmental Science 8 (2020): 613646. DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2020.613646. Posted with permission.

Access
Open
Rights
Works produced by employees of the U.S. Government as part of their official duties are not copyrighted within the U.S. The content of this document is not copyrighted.
Language
en
File Format
application/pdf
Citation Information
Baitong Chen, Jacek A. Koziel, Chumki Banik, Hantian Ma, et al.. "Mitigation of Odor, NH3, H2S, GHG, and VOC Emissions With Current Products for Use in Deep-Pit Swine Manure Storage Structures" Frontiers in Environmental Science Vol. 8 (2020) p. 613646
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/jacek_koziel/398/