Skip to main content
The Politics of Entitlement and State Failure in Zimbabwe
The Canadian Journal of Peace and Conflict Studies
  • Ismael Muvingi, Nova Southeastern University
Department of Conflict Resolution Studies
Publication Date
In 2008 the meltdown of the post colonial state of Zimbabwe climaxed in violence ridden presidential elections. The egregious extent of the violence instgated an imprecedented depature from the African diplomatic practice of speaking no evil of fellow leaders, with one or two countries even refusing to recognize Mugabe's presidency. Although the repressive nature of the government earned it international condemnation, for at least twenty years after independence Mugabe recieved significant electoral endorsement and little public protest. Even when forces massacred segments of the population and violently evicted the poor from cities, no civil society uprising emerged. This raises the question why the population acquiesced in the rulership of an inept and corrupt government. Utilizing theoretical concepts from Gramsci and Foucault, this paper argues that a hegemonic interplay of consensual and forceful power based on an ethos of liberation entitlement that was accepted by the public in part due to colonial resentment, enabled ZANU PF to maintain a monopoly on political office under the facade of democratic governance
Citation Information
Ismael Muvingi. "The Politics of Entitlement and State Failure in Zimbabwe" The Canadian Journal of Peace and Conflict Studies Vol. 40 Iss. 1 (2008) p. 77 - 101
Available at: