Skip to main content
Article
The Exclusionary Rule in Immigration Proceedings: Where It Was, Where It Is, Where It May Be Going
Faculty Publications
  • Irene Scharf, University of Massachusetts School of Law - Dartmouth
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2010
Abstract
The case alerted me to the continuing issue concerning the treatment of alleged violations of Fourth Amendment rights in immigration court, with this article the result of research conducted relating thereto. Beyond reviewing the relevant views of the federal courts of appeals; the administrative tribunal that handles appeals of immigration court cases, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA); and even local immigration courts; I consider whether the jurisprudence has remained static since the Supreme Court's watershed opinion on the issue about twenty-five years ago. I also offer suggestions as to how to effectively, fairly, and efficiently resolve the issues raised in the immigration context by these Fourth Amendment cases.
Comments

Copyright 2010 San Diego International Law Journal. Posted with the permission of the San Diego International Law Journal. Personal use of this material is permitted. In addition, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to severs or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from the San Diego International Law Journal. Hard copies and or electronic download of this article may be obtained by contacting the William S. Hein Co. at http://wshein.com or ESBCO at http://ejournals.ebsco.com/home.asp or Lexis/Westlaw.

Citation Information
Irene Scharf, The Exclusionary Rule in Immigration Proceedings: Where It Was, Where It Is, Where It May Be Going, 12 San Diego Int'l L. J. 53 (2010).