![](https://d3ilqtpdwi981i.cloudfront.net/p3JsmICs0tLIbT2skd7RqlMq3V0=/425x550/smart/https://bepress-attached-resources.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/29/3c/fe/293cfe3e-9a88-493c-b12d-7f3ff6324874/file.png)
Popular Press
Mystery of Citizens United Sequel is Format, Not Ending
The New York Times
(2012)
Abstract
Discusses Professor Robbins' ... "critique ... in The Tulane Law Review in an article by Ira P. Robbins, a law professor at American University. It was called “Hiding Behind the Cloak of Invisibility,” and it considered “per curiam” opinions, ones issued “by the court” without indication of authorship. “In the first six years of Chief Justice Roberts’s tenure,” Professor Robbins wrote, “almost 9 percent of the court’s full opinions were per curiams.”"
Keywords
- Per Curiam Opinions,
- Supreme Court
Disciplines
- Law and
- Jurisprudence
Publication Date
June 11, 2012
Citation Information
Ira P Robbins. "Mystery of Citizens United Sequel is Format, Not Ending" The New York Times (2012) Available at: http://works.bepress.com/ira_robbins/65/