Skip to main content
Article
Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Newborn Resuscitation Around Term: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Pediatris: Offical journal of the American Academy of Pediatris
  • Kari Holte, University of Stavanger, Norway
  • Hege Ersdal, University of Stavanger, Norway
  • Joar Eilevstjønn, Laerdal Medical, Norway
  • Øystein Gomo, Laerdal Medical, Norway
  • Claus Klingenberg, University Hospital of North Norway, Norway
  • Jørgen Linde, University of Stavanger, Norway
  • Monica Thallinger, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Norway
  • Hein Stigum, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Norway
  • Anita Yeconia, Haydom Lutheran Hospital, Tanzania
  • Hussein Kidanto, Aga Khan University
  • Ketil Størdal, Østfold Hospital Trust, Norway
Publication Date
10-1-2020
Document Type
Article
Disciplines
Abstract

BACKGROUND: International guidelines for resuscitation recommend using positive end-expiatory pressure (PEEP) during ventilation of preterm newborns. Reliable PEEP-valves for self-inflating bags have been lacking, and effects of PEEP during resuscitation of term newborns are insufficiently studied. The objective was to determine if adding a new PEEP valve to the bag-mask during resuscitation of term and near-term newborns could improve heart rate response.

METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was performed at Haydom Lutheran Hospital in Tanzania (September 2016 to June 2018). Helping Babies Breathe–trained midwives performed newborn resuscitation using self-inflating bags with or without a new, integrated PEEP valve. All live-born newborns who received bag-mask ventilation at birth were eligible. Heart rate response measured by ECG was the primary outcome, and clinical outcome and ventilation data were recorded.

RESULTS: Among 417 included newborns (median birth weight 3200 g), 206 were ventilated without and 211 with PEEP. We found no difference in heart rate response. Median (interquartile range) measured PEEP in the PEEP group was 4.7 (2.0–5.6) millibar. The PEEP group received lower tidal volumes (4.9 [1.9–8.2] vs 6.3 [3.9–10.5] mL/kg; P = .02) and had borderline lower expired CO2 (2.9 [1.5–4.3] vs 3.3 [1.9–5.0] %; P = .05). Twenty four-hour mortality was 9% in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence for improved heart rate response during bag-mask ventilation with PEEP compared with no PEEP. The PEEP valve delivered a median PEEP within the intended range. The findings do not support routine use of PEEP during resuscitation of newborns around term.

Citation Information

Holte, K., Ersdal, H., Eilevstjønn, J., Gomo, Ø., Klingenberg, C., Thallinger, M., ... & Størdal, K. (2020). Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Newborn Resuscitation Around Term: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Pediatrics, 146(4).