Skip to main content
Article
Democratic Deliberation in the Wild: The McGill Online Design Studio and the Regulation Room Project
Fordham Urban Law Journal
  • Cynthia Farina, Cornell Law School
  • Hoi Kong, McGill University
  • Cheryl Blake, Cornell Law School
  • Mary Newhart, CeRI
Abstract

Although there is no single unified conception of deliberative democracy, the generally accepted core thesis is that democratic legitimacy comes from authentic deliberation on the part of those affected by a collective decision. This deliberation must occur under conditions of equality, broadmindedness, reasonableness, and inclusion. In exercises such as National Issue forums, citizen juries, and consensus conferences, deliberative practitioners have shown that careful attention to process design can enable ordinary citizens to engage in meaningful deliberation about difficult public policy issues. Typically, however, these are closed exercises—that is, they involve a limited number of participants, often selected to achieve a representative sample, who agree to take part in an extended, often multi-stage process.

Citation Information
Cynthia Farina, Hoi Kong, Cheryl Blake and Mary Newhart. "Democratic Deliberation in the Wild: The McGill Online Design Studio and the Regulation Room Project" p. 1527
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/hoi-kong/4/