Skip to main content
Article
Should Sequels Differ from Original Movies in Pre-launch Advertising Schedule? Lessons from Consumers' Online Search Activity
International Journal of Research in Marketing (2018)
  • Ho Kim, University of Missouri-St. Louis
  • Norris I. Bruce, University of Texas at Dallas
Abstract
Sequels have become a profitable strategy in the U.S. motion picture industry because of their strong name recognition. However, while the established positioning of a sequel may help insulate it from competing firms' advertising messages, its familiarity may cause moviegoers to be more easily satiated with advertising from the sequel. Therefore, this study examines how sequels differ from original concept movies in terms of their ad effectiveness. We focus our analysis on pre-launch periods, given these periods' importance in shaping the financial outcomes of motion pictures. We consider the weekly online search volume of a movie as a measure of consumer interest in it, and thus as an intermediate response to pre-launch advertising. We then develop a model that assumes ad effectiveness can decline, due to copy and repetition wearout, and increase, due to forgetting, over time. We find that copy wearout is greater for original movies, while repetition wearout and forgetting are greater for sequels. These findings suggest that sequels should allocate more in early pre-launch periods and less immediately before release, relative to originals, to maximize pre-launch consumer interest.
Disciplines
Publication Date
March, 2018
DOI
10.1016/j.ijresmar.2017.12.006
Citation Information
Ho Kim and Norris I. Bruce. "Should Sequels Differ from Original Movies in Pre-launch Advertising Schedule? Lessons from Consumers' Online Search Activity" International Journal of Research in Marketing (2018) p. 116 - 143
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/ho-kim/3/