Skip to main content
Article
Faculty perception of engineering student cheating and effective measures to curb it
IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON
  • Sami W. Tabsh, American University of Sharjah
  • Hany A. El Kadi, Zayed University
  • Akmal S. Abdelfatah, American University of Sharjah
Document Type
Conference Proceeding
Publication Date
4-1-2019
Abstract

© 2019 IEEE. Engineering faculty were surveyed on issues related to academic dishonesty by students affiliated with their college at an American university located in the United Arab Emirates. The survey addressed perceived frequency of plagiarism, unauthorized collaboration, cheating, copyright violations and complicity in academic integrity. As expected, the majority of the faculty think that dishonesty is more common in-of-class work compared to proctored exams. They think that applying tougher penalties and using more proctors are the most effective methods in decreasing academic dishonesty. The authors believe that it would be helpful if faculty members follow the university's policy on cheating rather than make up their own rules in order to have consistent approach in dealing with academic dishonesty violations across the whole university. Ideally, the best way to combat dishonest acts at an institution is by educating students through seminars and workshops about the virtues of academic integrity and the benefits it brings to society. But until our campuses become free of dishonest behavior by students, some practical measures should be undertaken by the faculty to safeguard the institution against unethical behavior by students. For example, faculty members are recommended to either make their own assignments or modify the end-of-chapter problems from textbooks because students may have access to solution manuals. They are encouraged to give different homework problems and projects from one semester to another since students may have access to graded past work. While test banks provided to faculty by publishers may be used as a guide when creating exams, problems from such sources should not be put verbatim on exams by faculty because they are often available for purchase by students on the internet. Furthermore, the weight of-of-class assignments relative to the total course grade should be a small fraction of the total weight to discourage students from cheating on homework. Wireless signal jamming devices can combat some acts of e-cheating that utilizes the internet by disrupting communication between a smart phone and the cell-phone base station.

ISBN
9781538695067
Publisher
IEEE Computer Society
Disciplines
Keywords
  • Academic integrity,
  • Cheating,
  • Dishonesty,
  • Ethics,
  • Misconduct,
  • Plagiarism
Scopus ID
85067452332
Indexed in Scopus
Yes
Open Access
No
https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2019.8725199
Citation Information
Sami W. Tabsh, Hany A. El Kadi and Akmal S. Abdelfatah. "Faculty perception of engineering student cheating and effective measures to curb it" IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON Vol. April-2019 (2019) p. 806 - 810 ISSN: <a href="https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/id/publication/issn/2165-9559" target="_blank">2165-9559</a>
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/hany-elkadi/3/