Returning Sovereignty to the PeopleExpressO (2012)
AbstractGovernments across the world regularly invoke sovereignty to demand that the international community “mind its own business” while they commit human rights abuses. They proclaim that the sovereign right to be free from international intervention in domestic affairs permits them unfettered discretion within their territory. This Article seeks to challenge such proclamations by resort to sovereignty in the people, a time-honored principle that is typically more rhetorical than substantive. Relying on classical interpretations of sovereignty, this Article infuses substance into the concept of sovereignty in the people to recognize that a government is entitled to sovereign rights only as the legitimate representative of the people and as long as it fulfills its duties to them. The Article examines these conditions that must be met for a government to claim sovereign rights as well as how and by whom access to these rights should be determined. Taken to its logical conclusion, sovereignty in the people establishes that (1) sovereign rights can be lost when governments commit less than the most egregious human rights abuses, which differentiates this from Responsibility to Protect, and (2) any form of government is at risk of losing these rights, including democracies - two notions that are likely to be highly contentious. The Article relies on examples from Libya, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, India and France to illustrate its points.
Publication DateMarch 2, 2012
Citation InformationHallie Ludsin. "Returning Sovereignty to the People" ExpressO (2012)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/hallie_ludsin/2/