Skip to main content
Other
The Politics of Cather’s Regionalism: Margins, Centers and the Nebraskan Commonwealth
Presentations, Talks, and Seminar Papers -- Department of English
  • Guy Reynolds, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Date of this Version
3-25-2003
Comments
Presented March 25, 2003, at the Plains Humanities Alliance Research & Region Seminar, Great Plains Art Collection, 1155 Q Street, Lincoln NE
Abstract

Willa Cather remains a central figure in literary regionalism because she puts the central tenets of regionalism under intellectual pressure. One of the most familiar ways of thinking about American regions has been to think about an opposition between ‘section’ and ‘region’. Region tends to be used to define a geographical area, whereas a section denotes political or cultural identity. Cather is almost a sectionalist in her focus on the cultural and intellectual distinctiveness of the Nebraskan Commonwealth; but the very term itself links Nebraska to Virginia, rupturing a simple sense of section. Cather has a geographer’s sense of regional identity—the ‘black soil’ of the prairies; but this is regionalism with a twist, since the terrain is so lacking, apparently, in distinctive features. Cather’s definitions turn and inflect the definitions brought forward by regionalist thinkers. Finally, the lesson that Cather teaches us about regional thinking is that we need ever more supple, inflected, nuanced definitions in order to understand the complexities of the inter-connections between writing and place.

Citation Information
Guy Reynolds. "The Politics of Cather’s Regionalism: Margins, Centers and the Nebraskan Commonwealth" (2003)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/guy_reynolds/9/