Skip to main content
Comparison of clinical and biochemical markers of dehydration with the clinical dehydration scale in children: A case comparison trial
BMC Pediatrics
  • Ron K. Tam, University of Ottawa
  • Hubert Wong, Rouge Valley Health Systems
  • Amy Plint, University of Ottawa
  • Nathalie Lepage, University of Ottawa
  • Guido Filler, Western University
Document Type
Publication Date
URL with Digital Object Identifier

Background: The clinical dehydration scale (CDS) is a quick, easy-to-use tool with 4 clinical items and a score of 1-8 that serves to classify dehydration in children with gastroenteritis as no, some or moderate/severe dehydration. Studies validating the CDS (Friedman JN) with a comparison group remain elusive. We hypothesized that the CDS correlates with a wide spectrum of established markers of dehydration, making it an appropriate and easy-to-use clinical tool.Methods: This study was designed as a prospective double-cohort trial in a single tertiary care center. Children with diarrhea and vomiting, who clinically required intravenous fluids for rehydration, were compared with minor trauma patients who required intravenous needling for conscious sedation. We compared the CDS with clinical and urinary markers (urinary electrolytes, proteins, ratios and fractional excretions) for dehydration in both groups using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to determine the area under the curve (AUC).Results: We enrolled 73 children (male = 36) in the dehydration group and 143 (male = 105) in the comparison group. Median age was 32 months (range 3-214) in the dehydration and 96 months (range 2.6-214 months, p < 0.0001) in the trauma group. Median CDS was 3 (range 0-8) within the dehydration group and 0 in the comparison group (p < 0.0001). The following parameters were statistically significant (p < 0.05) between the comparison group and the dehydrated group: difference in heart rate, diastolic blood pressure, urine sodium/potassium ratio, urine sodium, fractional sodium excretion, serum bicarbonate, and creatinine measurements. The best markers for dehydration were urine Na and serum bicarbonate (ROC AUC = 0.798 and 0.821, respectively). CDS was most closely correlated with serum bicarbonate (Pearson r = -0.3696, p = 0.002).Conclusion: Although serum bicarbonate is not the gold standard for dehydration, this study provides further evidence for the usefulness of the CDS as a dehydration marker in children.Trial registration: Registered at (NCT00462527) on April 18, 2007. © 2014 Tam et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Citation Information
Ron K. Tam, Hubert Wong, Amy Plint, Nathalie Lepage, et al.. "Comparison of clinical and biochemical markers of dehydration with the clinical dehydration scale in children: A case comparison trial" BMC Pediatrics Vol. 14 Iss. 1 (2014)
Available at: