Skip to main content
Article
Reputation and Status: Expanding the Role of Social Evaluations in Management Research: From the Editors
Academy of Management Journal
  • Gerard GEORGE, Singapore Management University
  • Linus DAHLANDER
  • Scott D. GRAFFIN
  • Samantha SIM
Publication Type
Editorial
Version
publishedVersion
Publication Date
2-2016
Abstract

Organizations, whether private or public, are subject to evaluations by their stakeholder community and society. These social evaluations form the basis of perceptions targeted at the organization, and influence the organization’s interactions with its stakeholders. “Reputation,” defined as beliefs or perceptions held about the quality of a focal actor, and “status,” defined as relative professional position or social standing, are both forms of social evaluation. Following works by Fombrun and Shanley (1990) and Merton (1968), reputation and status as theoretical constructs have become popularized in the literature, and management scholars have provided empirical evidence to provide a more complete view of their influence. In this thematic issue,1 we review trends in empirical research on reputation and status published in Academy of Management Journal (AMJ), and highlight the current issues being tackled by this stream of enquiry.

Keywords
  • Social evaluations,
  • reputation,
  • status,
  • organizations
Identifier
10.5465/amj.2016.4001
Publisher
Academy of Management
Creative Commons License
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.4001
Citation Information
Gerard GEORGE, Linus DAHLANDER, Scott D. GRAFFIN and Samantha SIM. "Reputation and Status: Expanding the Role of Social Evaluations in Management Research: From the Editors" Academy of Management Journal Vol. 59 Iss. 1 (2016) p. 1 - 13 ISSN: 0001-4273
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/gerard-george/79/