Skip to main content
Taking Antitrust Away from the Courts
The Great Democracy Initiative
  • Ganesh Sitaraman
Document Type
Publication Date
  • antitrust,
  • Federal Trade Commission,
  • Sherman Act,
  • Clayton Act,
  • regulation,
  • monopoly,
  • competition law

A small number of firms hold significant market power in a wide variety of sectors of the economy, leading commentators across the political spectrum to call for a reinvigoration of antitrust enforcement. But the antitrust agencies have been surprisingly timid in response to this challenge, and when they have tried to assert themselves, they have often found that hostile courts block their ability to foster competitive markets. In other areas of law, Congress delegates power to agencies, agencies make regulations setting standards, and courts provide deferential review after the fact. Antitrust doesn’t work this way. Courts – made up of non-expert, unaccountable judges – set much of antitrust policy. This report provides a set of recommendations to take antitrust away from the courts – to restructure the antitrust laws and agencies in order to enhance the government’s ability to enforce antitrust laws more effectively and more transparently.

Citation Information
Ganesh Sitaraman. "Taking Antitrust Away from the Courts" The Great Democracy Initiative (2018) p. 1
Available at: