Skip to main content
Reclaiming Egalitarianism in the Political Theory of Campaign Finance Reform
Faculty Scholarship
  • Frank Pasquale, University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law
Document Type
Publication Date
  • campaign finance,
  • egalitarianism,
  • political theory,
  • Rawls,
  • deliberative democracy,
  • politics
Recent advocacy for campaign finance reform has been based on an ideal of the democratic process which is unrealistic and unhelpful. Scholars should instead return to its egalitarian roots. This article examines how deliberative democratic theory became the main justification for campaign finance reform. It exposes the shortcomings of this deliberativist detour and instead models campaign spending as an effort to commodify issue-salience. Given this dominant function of money in politics, a more effective paradigm for reform is equalizing influence. Advocates of campaign regulation should return to the original principles of reformers; not an idealized vision of the democratic process, but pragmatic concerns about moneyed interests acquiring too much influence over the nation's politics.
Publication Citation
2008 University of Illinois Law Review 599.
Citation Information
2008 University of Illinois Law Review 599.