Skip to main content
Other
William H. Sorrell, Attorney General of Vermont, et al. v. IMS Health Inc., et al. - Amicus Brief in Support of Petitioners
Faculty Scholarship
  • Kevin Outterson
  • David Orentlicher
  • Christopher T. Robertson
  • Frank A Pasquale, University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law
Document Type
Other
Publication Date
1-1-2011
Keywords
  • first amendment,
  • commercial speech,
  • privacy,
  • confidentiality,
  • data mining,
  • HIPAA
Abstract
On April 26, 2011, the US Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the Vermont data mining case, Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc. Respondents claim this is the most important commercial speech case in a decade. Petitioner (the State of Vermont) argues this is the most important medical privacy case since Whalen v. Roe. The is an amicus brief supporting Vermont, written by law professors and submitted on behalf of the New England Journal of Medicine
Citation Information
Kevin Outterson, David Orentlicher, Christopher T. Robertson and Frank A Pasquale. "William H. Sorrell, Attorney General of Vermont, et al. v. IMS Health Inc., et al. - Amicus Brief in Support of Petitioners" (2011)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/frank_pasquale/19/