Skip to main content
Article
Victor's Justice: The Next Best Moral Theory of Criminal Punishment?
Comparative Research in Law & Political Economy
  • François Tanguay-Renaud, Osgoode Hall Law School of York University
Research Paper Number
32/2012
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2012
Keywords
  • corrective justice,
  • criminal law,
  • general deterrence,
  • incommensurability,
  • justice,
  • moral justification of punishment,
  • state punishment
Abstract
In this essay, I address one methodological aspect of Victor Tadros's The Ends of Harm - namely, the moral character of the theory of criminal punishment it defends. First, I offer a brief reconstruction of this dimension of the argument, highlighting some of its distinctive strengths while drawing attention to particular inconsistencies. I then argue that Tadros ought to refrain from developing this approach in terms of an overly narrow understanding of the morality of harming as fully unified and reconciled under the lone heading of justice. In a final and most critical section, I offer arguments for why this reconciliatory commitment, further constrained by a misplaced emphasis on corrective justice, generates major problems for his general deterrence account of the core justification of criminal punishment.
Citation Information
François Tanguay-Renaud. "Victor's Justice: The Next Best Moral Theory of Criminal Punishment?" (2012)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/francois_tanguay-renaud/12/