Skip to main content
On Public Organizations in Ghana: What Differentiates Good Performers from Poor Performers?
African Development Review
  • Francis Y. Owusu, Iowa State University
Document Type
Publication Date
Public sector reform programs implemented across Africa, including the World Bank’s “first” and ‘second” generation reforms, are based on the assumption that all public organizations are inefficient. This problematic assumption has had significant implications for policy in Africa. By failing to recognize that not all public organizations perform poorly, we ignore any potential lessons that could have been learnt from the experiences of organizations that have managed to perform effectively under the same social, political, economic and institutional environment. This paper uses Ghana as a case study to examine whether there are significant differences in the characteristics of poor and good performing public organizations. We found that good and poor performing organizations in Ghana were significantly different in two respects: remuneration and hiring criteria.

This is the accepted version of the following article from African Development Review Vol.18 No.3 2006, pp.471- 485. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8268.2006.00151.x, which is been published in final form at:

Copyright Owner
File Format
Citation Information
Francis Y. Owusu. "On Public Organizations in Ghana: What Differentiates Good Performers from Poor Performers?" African Development Review Vol. 18 Iss. 3 (2006) p. 471 - 485
Available at: