Skip to main content
Article
Texas House Bill 51—An incognito performance-based funding policy: Implications for access and equity in Texas
Texas Education Review
  • Dwuana Bradley, University of Texas at Austin
  • Erin E. Doran, Iowa State University
Document Type
Article
Publication Version
Published Version
Publication Date
1-1-2018
DOI
10.26153/tsw/15
Abstract

Higher education policy discussions are largely shaped by competing viewpoints regarding who benefits from higher education—society or the individual (Bowen et al., 1997). This tension around who higher education most benefits informs decision-making for policy makers who might ultimately decide who should pay for higher education—the individual or state and federal governments (Labaree, 1997). Most importantly, the aforementioned premise undergirds policy makers’ perceptions of higher education as a justifiable public investment, which shapes their beliefs regarding their role in determining the function of public universities as state institutions (Labaree, 2013).

Comments

This article is published as Bradley, D., & Doran, E. E. (2018). Texas House Bill 51—An incognito performance- based funding policy: Implications for access and equity in Texas. Texas Education Review, 7(1), 85-101. DOI: 10.26153/tsw/15. Posted with permission.

Creative Commons License
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Copyright Owner
The Author(s)
Language
en
File Format
application/pdf
Citation Information
Dwuana Bradley and Erin E. Doran. "Texas House Bill 51—An incognito performance-based funding policy: Implications for access and equity in Texas" Texas Education Review Vol. 7 Iss. 1 (2018) p. 85 - 101
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/erin-doran/7/