Skip to main content
Article
Autumnal leaf senescence in Miscanthus × giganteus and leaf [N] differ by stand age
Journal of Experimental Botany
  • Nicholas N. Boersma, Iowa State University
  • Frank G. Dohleman, Monsanto Company
  • Fernando E. Miguez, Iowa State University
  • Emily A. Heaton, Iowa State University
Document Type
Article
Publication Version
Published Version
Publication Date
1-1-2015
DOI
10.1093/jxb/erv129
Abstract

Poor first winter survival in Miscanthus × giganteus has been anecdotally attributed to incomplete first autumn senescence, but these assessments never paired first-year with older M. × giganteus in side-by-side trials to separate the effect of weather from stand age. Here CO2 assimilation rate (A), photosystem II efficiency (ΦPSII), and leaf N concentration ([N]) were used to directly compare senescence in first, second, and third-year stands of M. ×giganteus. Three M. × giganteus fields were planted with eight plots, one field each in 2009, 2010, and 2011. To quantify autumnal leaf senescence of plants within each stand age, photosynthetic and leaf [N] measurements were made twice weekly from early September until a killing frost. Following chilling events (daily temperature averages below 10 °C), photosynthetic rates in first year plants rebounded to a greater degree than those in second- and third-year plants. By the end of the growing season, first-year M. × giganteus had A and ΦPSII rates up to 4 times greater than third-year M. × giganteus, while leaf [N] was up to 2.4 times greater. The increased photosynthetic capability and leaf N status in first-year M. × giganteussuggests that the photosynthetic apparatus was not dismantled before a killing frost, thus potentially limiting nutrient translocation, and may explain why young M. ×giganteus stands do not survive winter when older stands do. Because previous senescence research has primarily focused on annual or woody species, our results suggest that M. × giganteus may be an interesting herbaceous perennial system to investigate the interactive effects of plant ageing and nutrient status on senescence and may highlight management strategies that could potentially increase winter survival rates in first-year stands.

Comments

This article is from Journal of Experimental Biology 66 (2015): 4395–4401, doi:10.1093/jxb/erv129. Posted with permission.

Rights
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright Owner
The authors
Language
en
File Format
application/pdf
Citation Information
Nicholas N. Boersma, Frank G. Dohleman, Fernando E. Miguez and Emily A. Heaton. "Autumnal leaf senescence in Miscanthus × giganteus and leaf [N] differ by stand age" Journal of Experimental Botany Vol. 66 Iss. 14 (2015) p. 4395 - 4401
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/emily-heaton/14/