Skip to main content
Article
Clinical Legal Education: A (Brief) Comparison of the Evolving Structures and Pedagogy in Mexico, Canada and the United States
All Faculty Scholarship
  • Elizabeth Keyes, University of Baltimore School of Law
  • David C. Koelsch, University of Detroit Mercy School of Law
  • Alejandro Posadas, ITESM Escuela de Gobierno y Transformación Pública
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2014
Disciplines
Abstract

This Article highlights the development and current state of clinical legal education in Canada, the United States, and Mexico, and examines recent trends in clinical legal education in each country. This is a timely topic. Canadian clinics and, in particular, Ontario-based law school affiliated clinics are grappling with recently-imposed post-graduation alternatives to traditional articling practices, while Canadian law schools are examining whether additional experiential courses should be offered to law students. U.S. law schools face difficult choices with respect to clinical education in light of sustained lower enrollments and resulting adjusted budget realities, as well as the pressures of meeting the needs of a radically restructured legal marketplace. Mexican legal clinics have a proud and storied history of providing free legal services to local communities and are rapidly evolving into more formal structures, even as the market for a legal education in Mexico is undergoing a transformative change.

Citation Information
Clinical Legal Education: A (Brief) Comparison of the Evolving Structures and Pedagogy in Mexico, Canada and the United States, 91 U. Det. Mercy L. Rev. (2014)