Skip to main content
Article
The Role of Channel Orientation in B2B Technology Adoption
Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing
  • Elad Granot, Cleveland State University
  • Anthony K. Asare, Quinnipiac University
  • Thomas G. Brashear Alejandro, University of Massachusetts - Amherst
  • Vishal Kashya, Xavier University - Cincinnati
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2-22-2011
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to develop an in-depth understanding of the issues that organizations consider and experience when making the decision to adopt B2B technologies. Design/methodology/approach - The paper uses a qualitative approach to collect and analyze data. In-depth interviews were conducted to help generate new themes, and ideas about B2B technology adoption. After the data were collected, the authors used an elaborate multi-stage process to code, analyze, and interpret the data generated from the interviews. Findings - The main theme that emerged out of this study is that an organization's response to requests from its trading partner to adopt B2B technologies is highly influenced by its marketing channel orientation. The study identifies three types of marketing channel orientations that can influence a firm's technology adoption decision and demonstrates how each of these orientations influence a firm's responses and attitudes towards B2B technology adoption. Originality/value - The study is important to practitioners since it helps them recognize the value of understanding their trading partner's channel strategies and orientations as they develop strategies to get their suppliers to adopt B2B technologies. It also contributes to the academic literature by demonstrating the value of a firm's channel strategy orientation, a very important concept that has been ignored in the channels and B2B technology adoption literature.
DOI
10.1108/08858621111115912
Citation Information
Asare, A. K., Alejandro, T. G. B., Granot, E., & Kashyap, V. (2011). The role of channel orientation in B2B technology adoption. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 26(3), 193-201. doi:10.1108/08858621111115912