Skip to main content
Article
Ohio Incentives Decision Revisited
State Tax Notes (2005)
  • Edward A. Zelinsky, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
Abstract
Edward A. Zelinsky, of Yeshiva University, says the U.S. Sixth Circuit's decision in Cuno v. DaimlerChrysler, which struck down Ohio's investment tax credit as unconstitutional, did not make sense as a matter of tax policy or Commerce Clause doctrine; he also criticizes the decision's supporters.
Disciplines
Publication Date
September 19, 2005
Citation Information
Edward A. Zelinsky. "Ohio Incentives Decision Revisited" State Tax Notes Vol. 37 (2005) p. 859
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/edward-zelinsky/269/