On March 17, 2014, The Pacific Legal Foundation and Cato Institute cited and prominently featured the recent article, “Off the Board: NCAA v. Christie Challenges Congress to ‘Move the Line’ on the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act,” 118 PENN. ST. L. REV. 375 (2013), in the body of their amici curiae brief to the U.S. Supreme Court in support of Petitioners in Christie v. NCAA et al. (Petition denied.) This article advances the proposition that state governments are both more responsive to the constituencies affected by state-specific policies regarding sports gambling restrictions and more aware of the local conditions that those laws address.