Skip to main content
Article
Smurfing in Small Toxic Meth Labs: Impact of State Methamphetamine Precursor Policies
Journal of Policy Practice (2013)
  • C. J. VanderWaal
  • R. M. Young
  • Duane C McBride, Andrews University
  • J. F. Chriqui
  • Y. M. Terry-McElrath
Abstract
Over the past 12 years, 31 states have implemented a wide variety of policies to curb methamphetamine production in small toxic labs. This qualitative study explores the perceived impact of methamphetamine precursor laws in five states. Researchers conducted individual and focus group interviews with 77 key state policy makers and law enforcement personnel. Themes included barriers to development, perceived effectiveness and impact, effective provisions, and unintended consequences. Researchers suggest policy recommendations in light of renewed calls by policy makers and law enforcement personnel to address the recent rapid rise in small toxic lab seizures.
Keywords
  • methamphetamine precursor laws,
  • methamphetamine policy,
  • small toxic labs (STL),
  • child welfare policy,
  • pseudoephedrine
Publication Date
2013
Publisher Statement
Retrieved January 26, 2015. From http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15588742.2013.796214#.VMZOAeHk2nN
Citation Information
C. J. VanderWaal, R. M. Young, Duane C McBride, J. F. Chriqui, et al.. "Smurfing in Small Toxic Meth Labs: Impact of State Methamphetamine Precursor Policies" Journal of Policy Practice Vol. 12 Iss. 3 (2013)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/duane_mcbride/36/